This is the first book of Osho's that I have ever read.
Perhaps this was why I could never bring myself to actually read much of Osho’s works. A paragraph here and there was fine but I really couldn’t shake off the idea that here was essentially just an intelligent man playing to the galleries.
I had quite a few pre-conceived ideas about Osho till now(not all of
them complimentary) based on whatever I had heard about him over the years. The
irony is that most of the times, the people who were speaking to me about him
were actually praising him. However, the idea was firmly set in my mind that
Osho’s teachings were the direct opposite of what Vivekananda, a hero to me since childhood, professed.
Perhaps this was why I could never bring myself to actually read much of Osho’s works. A paragraph here and there was fine but I really couldn’t shake off the idea that here was essentially just an intelligent man playing to the galleries.
That was till I read “Krishna – The Man and His Philosophy.”
I still don’t agree with everything that Osho writes, there
are still questions unanswered, doubts which raise their head when I traverse through
some of the answers that Osho gives, but it is difficult to refute the fact
that one is forced to think, and think hard, about some very interesting ideas
that Osho discusses. And that is what makes reading Osho so much fun.
“Krishna – The Man and His Philosophy” is basically
conversations which Osho has with his followers during a ten day meditation
course at Manali in 1970. What begins as a free-wheeling discussion on the
personality of the historical figure called Krishna becomes nothing short of an
interpretation of the essence of The Bhagavad Gita.
Nor is Krishna the only personality discussed. Constant
parallels are drawn with Buddha, Mahavir, Christ and Mohammed. What is
refreshing to see is that Osho doesn’t just extol the virtues of any one of
these great personalities. He points out the ideologies of each of them,
leaving for us to decide which “path” we choose to seek.
Seekers such as
Diogenes, Ramakrishna, Vivekananda, Tagore and Krishnamurthy are also spoken
of. Enjoyable, memorable and hence, recall-worthy anecdotes about each of them
are scattered throughout the book. Sri Aurobindo of Pondicherry (whose identity
I was initially confused about since Osho kept referring to him simply as ‘Aravind’),
however, comes in for severe criticism.
What made the book most enjoyable was the fact that Osho
keeps narrating one anecdote after another to drive home his point. Albeit
these sometimes simplify the message to a great degree, they are nonetheless
essential for a beginner (like myself) to understand the core of what Osho is
trying to convey.
A great book, if for nothing else but for its ability to
force you to think (rethink?) about religious and spiritual stand-points. An
absolute must-read.